Directory

Proposal: Use non-default port for wp-env by vcanales · Pull Request #611 · WordPress/create-block-theme · GitHub
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Use non-default port for wp-env #611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

vcanales
Copy link
Member

I find myself having to stop my Gutenberg environment, which uses the default port, when working on both at around the same time. This change should make it easier to have both environments running in parallel.

I realize I could choose to run a .wp-env.override.json file as well, but I think this might benefit other folks as well.

I find myself having to stop my Gutenberg environment, which uses the
default port, when working on both at around the same time. This change
should make it easier to have both environments running in parallel.
@vcanales vcanales added enhancement New feature or request build tooling labels Apr 30, 2024
@vcanales vcanales changed the title Use non-default port for wp-env Proposal: Use non-default port for wp-env Apr 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@matiasbenedetto matiasbenedetto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The containers run at the specified ports. It looks good to me.

@pbking pbking merged commit 0524255 into trunk May 9, 2024
2 checks passed
@pbking pbking deleted the try/use-non-default-port-for-wp-env branch May 9, 2024 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build tooling enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants